Add this to my long list of gripes about Adobe Encore (currently using CS4).
Just opened a project that had been burning fine. Changed nothing. Now after I click “build,” Encore gives me an error of “Trims and/or chapters adjusted.”
Most solutions found via the web suggest this problem arises after transcoding, however, my video and audio is all MPEG-DVD generated out of Premiere (no transcoding occurs in Encore).
Lame.
…
I haven’t tried it out yet, and I won’t be anytime soon as I’m running many, many video renders on this machine and it’s not really the best time to try to watch Hulu, but I was very happy to see this message when I powered on today:
[UPDATE] One solution (as posted by Greg in comments): find any disabled clips in your timeline. If two disabled clips are butted against one another, Premiere will not play (obviously a glitch in the program). Thanks, Greg!
I have had this problem when only one clips is disabled, but hopefully the above works for you!
Attention Colorado business owners:
I have an LLC for my business in Colorado. Colorado requires a business’s information be kept up to date with the State with yearly filing. The fee for this service is $10, and can be done entirely online (you can do it with physical copies on paper, but it’s more expensive).
This year I received forms around tax time stating that I needed to pay a $225 filing fee. The form looks kind of official, so I did a little research to make sure I wasn’t missing something.
So you know “Corporate Controllers Unit” is a Nevada based company. They have NOTHING to do with the state of Colorado. If you read carefully, you’ll see that technically they are offering to help you file your paperwork. Thus, what they are offering is a “service.”
Just above the signature line at the bottom of the page is this sentence: “This product or service has not been approved or endorsed by any Government Agency and this offer is not being made by an agency of the Government. U.S.C. 39.6.3001(d). This is a solicitation for the order of services, and not a bill, invoice or statement of account due. You are under no obligation to make any payments on account of this offer.”
However, they are making it look like they are agents of the Government, and you are required to pay this fee.
Don’t fall for it.
Just a few sources on the subject:
It’s unbelievably lame that when you add media to your media folder, iTunes won’t automatically import it into your library. And it’s NOT that it’s not COMPLETELY possible (and already scripted/coded). In iTunes 9 they actually implemented a special folder (it’s freaking called “Automatically Add to iTunes” and sits in your iTunes directory) that you can (read: HAVE TO) add media to to have it automatically show up in your library.
[beat]
So why the F*CK not just implement that code with the f*cking MEDIA FOLDER?!
Unbelievable. Typical, and what is apparently the norm, but still somehow unbelievable.
 |
 |
Lifehacker and Gizmodo used to be the blogs I read most often. However, recently all Gawker Media sites underwent a change that at first was just annoying, but after trying to use for a couple of weeks I find is downright prohibitive. Until things change, I’ve actually gone so far as to remove Gizmodo and Lifehacker from my RSS feeds [sniff- I’ll miss you guys!].
First of all, any internal linking (which they use a lot of) has been obliterated, especially on mobile devices (which is where I most often view these sites). Because mobile devices are automatically routed to a page which lists the most recent posts (there doesn’t seem to be any getting around this), ANY link you click will take you to the new “main” page (not the page you were trying to click to).
Also, when using an RSS feed, you see a preview of the stories on a site. It used to be you’d click on the preview for any Lifehacker or Gizmodo story and go straight to the full story. Now you click the preview, get taken to the “main” page, have to find the story again (often buried deep on the list), and then have to click to the story in order to actually read the material.
It was bad enough when Lifehacker and Gizmodo truncated their previews to just a few sentences from the story. The new format is now impossible. For a contrast (that works), Engadget usually shows nearly all the text from a story in my RSS Agregator. I can get the full idea of the story, and if it’s something I’m really interested in, I’ll click through to the site. The new Gawker format forces you to click through (and then sift through crap looking for the story) just to get a HINT of what’s going on. Gawker may think it will increase traffic to their sites, but I’m not willing to do that, and I’m betting a lot of other people aren’t either (and will just find alternative sources for their news).
I honestly can’t figure out what the hell is going on with their new landing page (Lifehacker or Gizmodo –they’re set up the same) when using my desktop browser, so I’ve just stopped visiting altogether. It’s so convoluted with photos, ads, and oddly aligned garbage that it’s not even worth my time.
I went to the Lifehacker site and wrote one of the editors (Adam) to voice my concerns, and I was surprised to actually get a personal e-mail back. He assured me they were working on the issues. Unfortunately though, they aren’t working on them fast enough, and they’re losing readers. Hit any blog/forum discussion of the issue, and you’ll see that people are abandoning ship.
Surely Gawker Media is a aware of how bad things are. I can’t believe they haven’t just reverted to the old setup until they can better work things out for a new format.
They are seriously screwing the proverbial pooch here.
[update] Even Penny Arcade agrees!
…
It is so hard to type through the tears.
Tonight LCD Soundsystem bids farewell with their last live broadcast performance. Their last “official show” will be April 2nd at Madison Square Garden. The show sold out “instantly.” Hopefully we’ll still get to catch ultra-underground performances at nameless bars and secret knock clubs across the planet for years to come, but only time will tell.
James Murphy was interviewed by Stephen Colbert, before performing “I Can Change” and then waving toodle-oo. The mellow tune was well done and apropos.
As an aging musician, it was hard to hear the “I’m getting to old to rock” sentiment that Murphy (age 41) put forth as the impetus for the move, but to each his own (and I can certainly understand where he’s coming from).
I still plan to keep writing and rocking well into my 90’s; maybe I’m losing my edge.
…
